How Our Analytics Engine Converts Instantly Data into Clear, Actionable Insights
Problem
Cold outreach today is largely guesswork. Most teams operate blindly, relying on intuition rather than insights. Despite sending thousands of emails, there’s no consistent method for evaluating what actually works. Analytics, where they exist, are often too generic to be actionable, indicating that something “performs,” but not why or how.
This system was first built to give Instantly users a way to see beyond surface metrics, to stitch campaigns together, analyse performance across segments, and actually understand what’s working. When you're operating at that kind of volume, gut feel just isn’t good enough.
Despite the original platform being built for instantly, The framework itself is fully platform-agnostic.
Industry Challenge
- No scientific or repeatable approach to cold outreach.
- Teams use spray-and-pray tactics, wasting time and resources.
- Lack of infrastructure to analyse results across campaigns.
- Agencies struggle to build repeatable processes for different clients.
- Insights from past campaigns are rarely translated into better future performance.
Impact
This Leads to:
- Inefficient campaigns with low ROI.
- Teams unable to scale outreach effectively.
- Inconsistent performance from one client project to another.
- Missed opportunities for optimisation and learning.
Why We Build Analytics Infrastructure for Our Outbound Campaigns
Campaign stats like reply rates might be tracked, sometimes in a spreadsheet, sometimes in a dashboard, but they’re rarely actionable, and they’re almost never centralized.
We built an internal layer that not only centralizes metrics like emails sent, reply count, positive replies, and bounce rate, but makes them usable. Instead of digging through sequencer tabs, operators get a clean view across all campaigns and clients, with filters that actually match how they think: segment, persona, channel, or outcome.
.png)
Even at this basic level, there’s immediate value. Seeing bounce spikes by inbox lets you flag deliverability issues before they snowball. Tracking reply-to-send ratios over time gives you a clearer signal than generic "open rates" ever could. And having a reliable positive reply count , especially when paired with enrichment, lets you reverse-engineer what messaging actually lands.
For agencies running multiple client accounts, we layer in client-level overview analytics. You can scan performance trends across all accounts, identify which clients are stalling, and surface underperforming verticals at a glance. It’s not just about “what worked”, it’s about where to double down next.
This becomes especially critical when campaign managers are running in parallel, using different targeting strategies. The overview layer creates shared visibility, and gives leadership a way to direct focus without wading through Slack threads and screenshots.
.png)
From Surface Metrics to Real Insight
.png)
The real shift starts when we go deeper: breaking down interested replies by attributes like job title, industry, or company size. But to do that, the backend has to be solid. You need two things in place: a consistent data schema and normalisation.
Without a consistent structure, you can’t compare anything. One campaign manager writes “IT consulting,” another uses “IT Consulting,” and now your filters break. We often work with agencies that have 3–4 campaign managers all importing data in slightly different ways. Our job is to standardize that.
And if your current systems don’t support proper schema? We get creative. For example, when a reply comes in, we enrich the prospect in real time using third-party data (like Apollo), then push the clean, normalised info into the warehouse. It’s not perfect, costs money, and there’s always a margin of error, but it gives you enough accuracy to work with.
The Kind of Analysis That Moves the Needle
Once the infrastructure is in place, we can build truly useful tools, like heatmaps that show when prospects tend to reply, based on send times. Or matrices that highlight which combinations of job titles and industries are converting. These insights can inform not just campaign strategy, but offer positioning and ICP refinement.
.png)
At the same time, we also track and categorize objection types received from prospects, whether it’s budget concerns, timing issues, or product fit doubts, so messaging and qualification criteria can be refined continuously.
These insights can inform not just campaign strategy, but offer positioning and ICP refinement.
.png)
The thing is, even 7-figure agencies often aren’t doing any of this. They’re still copying campaign stats manually from their sequencer into spreadsheets once a week. That means the data is late, often wrong, and totally siloed.
The real power comes when you use that infrastructure to run experiments. You start grouping prospects into predefined segments: A, B, C, D, and track performance across time. You make targeting decisions based on data, not guesses. That’s when this stuff starts to compound.
But It Only Works If You Know How to Use It
There’s a misconception we hear often: “Should I segment the leads before uploading?” No. As long as the data is clean and normalised, you can run segmentation after the campaign. You don’t need to frontload that thinking.
The real challenge isn’t building the tool, it’s helping the operators think correctly. A lot of people see a chart and think they’re doing analytics. But interpreting a reply heatmap and drawing the right conclusions from it is both a skill and a mindset. It’s like any tool, used wrong, it just looks pretty.
And this only works if you’re working with variables you can actually get at scale. Industry, job title, and geography are reliable. Things like revenue are nice in theory but too spotty to base decisions on.
Even something as basic as “industry” from Apollo often needs work. You might need to run AI categorisation based on company descriptions. It all depends on how important that data point is to your targeting.
Why We Push for This
Here’s our core belief: if you’re not looking at the data, you’re playing the wrong game. You’re flying blind, surrounded by hidden pitfalls, and as your client count and team size grow, those blind spots only multiply.
Once an agency has 5 clients or more, the need becomes obvious. Especially when there are multiple campaign managers running tests with zero data visibility. This is where the infrastructure pays off.
And one last point: don’t get tricked by deliverability tools that pretend to give you a clear signal. Deliverability is a hard thing to measure. Your best proxy is often reply rate, but even that depends on targeting. What does help is diversification: don’t rely on one email provider (e.g. G Suite) or one vendor. Mix providers (Outlook, SMTP, etc.) and vendors (Maildozo, Outreach Today, etc.) to spread risk.